《西藏研究》汉文版

吴丰培先生所藏《道光拉萨厅志》不仅其序大而无当,而且其中将别蚌寺(哲蚌寺)和米堆寺误认为是两个寺,将大召寺、菊岗寺也误认为两个寺,这使人很难相信作者"宦藏地久"。另外,该书作者李梦皋生平并无其他文献可佐证。有清一代,拉萨亦无厅之建制。更重要的是,这本自称完成于1845年的书,其诸多程站记载,竟与1907年出版的日文书的一部分雷同。而这一部分的内容是19世纪70年代末印度间谍南.辛格进出拉萨的路线记录。其中,几十个地名,竟然连距离和里数也基本吻合,由此可证,所谓李梦皋所撰的《道光拉萨厅志》应为伪作。

According to the research of this paper,the manuscript of "The Records of Lhasa in the Daoguang Era"collected by Mr.WU Feng-pei is the forged one.There are a lot of mistakes in the descriptions in it.For instance,it claimed that Drepung Monastery and Temple of "Rice Pile"(the literally translated name of Drepung)were two different temples.More importantly,this book claimed to be completed in 1845,but a lot of stations and routes,the dozens of names,and even the distance and mileage mentioned in it were similar to a book published in Japanese in 1907.