| 216 | 2 | 3 |
| 下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
"空有之争"在佛教思想史中具有重要的意义,"空有之争"所探讨的问题由于涉及佛陀正义而为中国佛教广泛关注。近现代,以宗喀巴为主的藏传中观学的传入,为"空有之争"的探讨提供了一个新的路向。根据宗喀巴的探讨,"空有之争"是通过三个核心问题展开的,包括依他起性胜义空不空、是否需要安立阿赖耶识、中观之空是否就是断灭。宗喀巴通过对这三个问题的探究,以自空与他空抉择空有之争,安立中观应成为了义正见。
Abstract："Empty Debate" is of great significance in the history of Buddhist thought,"Empty Debate"explored the issue as it involves justice for the Chinese Buddhism attention. In modern time,Tsong kha pa's view in Madhyamika disseminated in mainland China and it provided a chance for Chinese scholars to discuss about Tsongkhapa's thonght in "empty debate". This paper argues that,according to explore Tsongkhapa,"Empty Debate" through the three core issues,including cases of sexual Katsuyoshi according to his empty is not empty,the need for Anritsu Alaya,the air is whether the concept of extinguished. Thvough abovementioned three Tsongkhapa explore the empty debate of in a self empty and Takong.
[1]宗喀巴.宗喀巴大师集(第4卷)·辨了不了义善说藏论[M].北京:民族出版社,2001.
[2]宗喀巴.宗喀巴大师集(第3卷)·入中论善显密意疏[M].北京:民族出版社,2001.
[3]宗喀巴.宗喀巴大师集(第1卷)·菩提道次第广论[M].北京:民族出版社,2001.
[4]法尊.中观宗关于“安立业果”与“名言中许有外境”的问题[M]//法尊法师论文集.台北:大千,2002.
[5]龙树.中论[G]卷三//大正藏第30册,台北:佛陀教育基金会,1995.
(1)为梵语alaya之音译。唯识宗立眼、耳、鼻、舌、身、意、末那、阿赖耶八识,此即八识之一。
(2)亦称三自性,即遍计所执性,依他起性,圆成实性。此三自性,为唯识宗一切法义的根本。
(1)认为佛教所说的空是连因果都不存在的观点。
基本信息:
DOI：
中图分类号:B948
引用信息:
[1]丁建华.论宗喀巴“空有之争”思想[J].西藏研究,2016,No.158(04):32-37.
基金信息:
国家社科基金项目“太虚与欧阳竟无佛学思想研究”(项目编号:14BZJ015)阶段性成果